Beaming Satellite Internet Into China

For China To Achieve Double Digit Growths Again
Sergey Brin's Is The Right Stand

I have been curious. And Quora has the answer. As suspected, the technology is there, it is the law that seems to be the problem. My definition of free speech in the 21st century is unfettered internet access.

The US bombarded Libya. Beaming satellite internet into undemocratic countries fits my definition of nonviolence beautifully. And I am guessing it is way cheaper than warfare.

Another would be the ring of fire concept. You would beam satellite internet along the border of a country and, oops, sorry some of it spilled over into your country.

Why hasn't anyone beamed satellite-based internet service to China to undermine the Chinese firewall?

There is satellite Internet service available in China - however it's generally subject to the same restrictions, and costs significantly more. In order to get a license to broadcast the signal over the country, the satellite ISP's usually need to either route the traffic through that country (which is transparent to you - i.e.: doesn't show up on a trace route), or support lawful/legal intercept/wiretapping by the country in question. See news last month RIM and India - even though it wasn't satellite, the Indian government wasn't satisfied until RIM put servers in country to allow the government to do lawful/legal intercept.

Due to international rules + regulations, you can't just 'Beam Satellite signals' into a country without their permission.

Satellite Internet access
Internet in China

Related articles

• Satellite Wars: China unveils 'cheaper' answer to GPS
• China launches global navigation system in Asia-Pacific
• East county emerges from digital Dark Ages
• MonkeyBrains seeks $350,000,000 for its own satellite

Data Centers And Light Phones

World map depicting Asia Esperanto: Mondmapo bildiganta Azion Español: Ubicación de Asia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

If the data centers are pervasive enough and powerful enough, your phone can be light as light. The two extreme ends feed on each other. Larry Ellison is right. There is no cloud. What we refer to as cloud is really these data centers. I am surprised Google lags so far behind in Asia. And I am guessing it lags even further behind in Africa and Latin America. Come on, Google, you can do better than this.

New Google Asia servers expected to bring 30% speed boost when they go live later this year

the new servers could provide up to a 30 percent improvement in the speed of Google services in Asia .... Google already operates seven data centers in the US and facilities in Finland, Belgium and Ireland, but the lack of an Asia center has likely inhibited the company’s potential for growth in the region

Related articles

• New Google Asia servers expected to bring 30% speed boost when they go live later this year
• Google's new Asia data centers to up speed of services
• Google's Data Center Alligators
• Cooling the Google Data Center and the World
• Google opens up on seven years of its data center history [GigaOM]
• The Internet Wears Shorts
• Google unveils the Bugatti of data centers.
• Inside Google's Top Secret Data Centers
• A Week in the Life of 3 Keywords
• Google Operates a Massive Worldwide Database with GPS and Atomic Clocks

The Underbanked, The Underserved

There is a lot of room for for profit microfinance.

Tech’s Hot New Market: The Poor

some 2.5 billion people globally lack access to basic financial services like checking accounts, debit accounts, credit, and insurance. Though not integrated into the mainstream financial system, they will still spend around $6 trillion annually

Related articles

• Tech startups changing the face of money lending
• CashNetUSA | San Antonio, Texas #2 Most Underbanked City in the U.S. - CashNetUSA
• Community Bank Targets Underbanked New Yorkers
• Banks could do more for unbanked
• Millions of consumers considered underbanked
• Bank accounts key to helping needy families
• Mobile banking could be focused on those without traditional accounts | CreditRepair.com
• Bank Accounts Key To Helping Needy Families
• American Express and Walmart Bluebird Prepaid Card Evaluation
• The perfect storm to change the financial behaviors of the populations that need it most

Snapchat, Poke And Facebook

Image via CrunchBase

You end up feeling like you have seen this movie before. Facebook tried to do in FourSquare. FourSquare's popularity skyrocketed after Facebook's try.

Pokey

Snapchat, the trendy smartphone app that lets you send photos and videos that self-destruct after a few seconds ....... Facebook constantly “roams the tech universe in search of interesting technology, then mercilessly assimilates all the best stuff into its ever-larger catalog of features.” Over the last couple years it has copied the defining ideas behind Foursquare, Twitter, Google+, Groupon, GroupMe, Instagram, Quora — and now Snapchat. .... The only reason that the app could acquire millions of users in a few months’ time is because Snapchat spread through each of its users’ Facebook friends. Instagram and Pinterest, the two other recent social-networking successes, also benefited tremendously from their users’ Facebook’s connections. .... Every photo that people were sharing through Instagram was a dagger at the heart of Facebook, the world’s largest photo site. That’s why Facebook attempted to copy Instagram—see its Camera app—and then had to buy it. Similarly, every message that you send to your Facebook friends through Snapchat is a lost opportunity for Facebook. That’s why Facebook had to squash it. ... But Poke is already losing to Snapchat in the app standings. Like Facebook’s failed imitations of Instagram and Quora, Poke’s quick decline shows that if Facebook wants to stay on the vanguard of online communication, it needs to act even before it sees an opportunity—by the time somebody else has had success with something, Facebook’s version isn’t going to catch on.

Related articles

• Facebook's sexting poke chat app
• Facebook app spurs spike in Snapchat popularity
• Facebook's Poke Is a Wild Success - for Rival Snapchat
• Why Facebook's 'Poke' App Couldn't Kill Snapchat
• How Anybody Can Secretly Save Your Snapchat Videos Forever
• SnapChat rises: Why Poke's decline shows Facebook's inability to invent [GigaOM]
• Everyone Is Talking About How Facebook Tried - And Failed - To Copy Yet Another Popular Startup (FB)
• Bug affecting Facebook Poke, Snapchat apps saves 'deleted' videos
• Facebook Poke and Snapchat bug saves "deleted" videos
• Snapchat Users Are Bashing Facebook's Copycat Poke App (FB)

A Social Graph Can't Last 10 Years

Image by Spark Capital via CrunchBase

I am saying this before I have read the blog post. I am responding to the title of the blog post. Now let me go read.

Bijan Sabet: Can a social graph last more than 10 years?

Because the graph we have today is much more interesting and useful than previous graphs. We are connected in new ways that touch us deeply. And they have their own characteristics.

Hunter Walk: Trying to be the one true social graph is like trying to hold water in your fist

Facebook needed to buy Instagram because it was creating a mobile-first photo-centric social network. Snapchat is interesting to Facebook because it's creating a mobile-first ephemeral content social network. Twitter was threatening enough to Facebook because of an asymmetric follow graph that Facebook added the equivalent 'subscribe' option. And so it goes... I don't believe Facebook's position as the 'one graph to rule them all' is established. They'll continue to be successful and useful for quite a long time - and they may even be the largest single graph - but it's not going to be the only one of consequence. .... There will be another Instagram, another Snapchat. Facebook can't buy or fast-follow all of the innovations. Can they?

These guys are talking about particular products like Facebook, Twitter, and so on. That is not what I am talking about. I am talking about the real social graph, the one technology tries to emulate. Solitude is when you want to be left alone. What is your social graph then? A good service would know that. When you are with someone you really want to be with, you do not want to be bothered by anyone else. What is your social graph then? The most engaged people in your life - that list changes over time. What I am saying is none of the mentioned services have been able to grab that real social graph.

Related articles

• Trying to be the one true social graph is like trying to hold water in your fist
• Bijan Sabet - Can a social graph last more than 10 years?
• Building The Implicit Social Graph
• Building The Implicit Social Graph
• The Real Reason for Poke and How Facebook was Left Naked by Snapchat
• Snapchat and our never-ending quest for impermanence [GigaOM]
• Understanding Open Graph Protocol
• The reality of mixing the social graph with search engines: It doesn't work
• Has Facebook's Reign Come And Gone Already?
• Bringing your social graph to TV, meet Stevie