Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Thursday, August 14, 2025

14: Keyu Jin: China

The Protocol of Greatness (novel)
Liquid Computing: The Future of Human-Tech Symbiosis
Velocity Money: Crypto, Karma, and the End of Traditional Economics
The Next Decade of Biotech: Convergence, Innovation, and Transformation
Beyond Motion: How Robots Will Redefine The Art Of Movement
ChatGPT For Business: A Workbook
Becoming an AI-First Organization
Quantum Computing: Applications And Implications
Challenges In AI Safety
AI-Era Social Network: Reimagined for Truth, Trust & Transformation

Remote Work Productivity Hacks
How to Make Money with AI Tools
AI for Beginners

Russia announces nuclear deployment planning with top ally
Trump Issues Stark Warning to Russia Ahead of Putin Summit Trump said "there will be very severe consequences" and that "he doesn't have to" specify what, should Russia not move toward a cease-fire............ Trump was then asked if he believes he can "convince" Putin to "stop targeting civilians in Ukraine," to which he replied: "I've had a lot of good conversations with him [Putin], but then I go home and see that a rocket hit a nursing home [or an apartment building] and people are laying dead in the street, so I guess the answer to that is 'no.'" ........ Trump's remarks came shortly after he shared an “exceptionally constructive and good conversation” with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and key European leaders on Wednesday, according to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. ......... Zelensky, meanwhile, warned Trump that Putin is “bluffing” about being open to a cease-fire and lasting peace. .......... French President Emmanuel Macron divulged that while the group discussed a potential exchange of land, “as of today, there are no serious territorial exchange plans on the table.” Zelensky and Merz both reiterated the need for a cease-fire and strong Ukrainian security guarantees before any negotiations take place. ........... After the conversation, Zelensky said that Trump struck down the idea that Russia could veto Ukraine’s NATO membership aspirations and reiterated calls for possible economic penalties on Russia—which the U.S. President has repeatedly promised to enact—should a cease-fire deal not be reached. ......... Trump previously stated that a lasting cease-fire in the Russia-Ukraine war, which was triggered when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, could only come through the exchange of territories “for the betterment of both.” Zelensky, backed by his European allies, staunchly denounced that idea, stating that Ukraine will not “gift their land to the occupier.” ......... “The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,” the leaders of France, Italy, the U.K., Germany, Poland, and Finland said in a statement on Saturday. “We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force.” ........... Russian troops advanced deeper into Ukraine on Tuesday, in what some have viewed as a bid to pressure Kyiv into considering Putin’s demands for more territory. “We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations,” Zelensky said. ........... “Very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin. Constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people,” Trump said via Truth Social, before referencing recent comments made by his former national security adviser John Bolton, who asserted that “Putin has already won,” in an interview with The Atlantic.

The meeting of the Nazis against Russia history repeats itself
— Georgiana Balanica (@GeorgianaB83826) August 13, 2025

My Formula for Ukraine Peace Is Better https://t.co/uogVmgxGXb
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) August 13, 2025

pic.twitter.com/3Nd9F2bEOs
— 🇩🇪Bonkrenzius🇩🇪Fellafreund🇺🇦Germanis🇺🇦🇪🇺 (@HerbertHand5) August 13, 2025

pic.twitter.com/LK811ctymS
— Southern 🇺🇸🇩🇰🇺🇦 (@NavyVet135) August 13, 2025

Remote Work Productivity Hacks
How to Make Money with AI Tools
AI for Beginners

"The ball in putin's court." Geezus Christ. Who needs Nato? You can happily leave the ball in putin's court permanently now. Well done! Happy days.
— 🇳🇿 Tetyana 🇺🇦 (@TanyaMykolaiv) August 13, 2025

If you had any balls this war would be over. Ukraine is sacrificing its best so we can all live fat and happy. It makes me sick. We need more decisive actions against russia. Enough is enough.
— Кобзар 🇨🇦🇺🇦 (@CanadianKobzar) August 13, 2025

ₜrump is legitimising a war criminal who ordered kidnapping Ukrainian children and sells them online to ᵣussian pedophiles.

wars aren't won by one pedophile meeting another.
— ᗺɹɐʞ Sóʍ, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 ᵣ𝚞𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚖ï𝚜ï𝚌 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚝. (@exileoftza) August 13, 2025

I have not been happy with your derailment of admitting Ukraine into NATO. That is how you achieve lasting peace in Ukraine.
— ForMYEyes (@ForMYEyesCanada) August 13, 2025

Nie słyszałam ,żeby NATO i USA wycofali swoje siły militarne i wywiadowcze z Ukrainy ,i nie słyszałam aby Ukraina przyjęła warunki Moskwy więc po co to gadanie bzdur ,że piłka jest po stronie prezydenta Rosji W. Putina .Nie potrafi Pan wyciągać wniosków że zdarzeń i wypowiedzi a…
— alicja selerska (@AlicjaSelerska) August 13, 2025

https://t.co/97OoYasEPV
Great call 🤡🤡 zelensky staat stijf van de coke 🤡🤡
— 🦋Ann Van Haute 🦋 (@Anneke172351868) August 13, 2025

Sir,

You are at risk of “hitching your wagon to the wrong horse”. This guy has a proven track record of appeasing Putin or doing nothing.

Putin is the one person in this world that the buffoon has never criticized or attacked. We should consider these facts seriously.

It…
— George2023! (@George2023K9) August 13, 2025

"The ball is now in Putin's court"? Really? So he has all the cards? Do you even think before writing such bullshit? Can NATO be more fragile than under your "leadership"? Geez, you're licking Trump's boots. What a shame, especially after the 5% commitment of EU members, more…
— Gregor Derewenko (@GDerewenko) August 13, 2025

Remote Work Productivity Hacks
How to Make Money with AI Tools
AI for Beginners

This mass murderer and war criminal is not someone to negotiate with. pic.twitter.com/SKmd1k0f4S
— Laura CrowFella🌻🇺🇦🇮🇱🇱🇹🇺🇸 (@elvee57) August 13, 2025

If the West had any backbone, it would drive Moscow out of Ukraine to avoid another Munich Agreement and isolate Russia until the Kremlin’s leadership stands trial in The Hague.
— Johanna Nyman (@JohannaNyman5) August 13, 2025

Here’s my peace plan.

1, Provide Ukraine a squadron of F-35 to degrade orc AD and radar.

2, provide long range cruise missiles.

3, Provide 10,000 shahed type drones per week to destroy oil infrastructure.

4, Use NATO aircraft to shoot down missiles aimed at Ukrainian cities. pic.twitter.com/3gJbFYsQFx
— Cumbrian NAFO Fella 🇺🇦🦈🇬🇪🇨🇦🦞Main Bastard (@DiscoBiscuit78) August 13, 2025

What are you saying, Mark?
That YOU, appreciate @realDonaldTrump's leadership in this meeting?

It wasn't a video call, was it?
How long was/is your nose😂?

May I ask?
When did Donald give THE ball back to @KremlinRussia_E
that THE ball is now in Vladimirs court,
I mean?
🦋🌈❤️ pic.twitter.com/0oddLfbhM9
— Cora Baart (@CoraBaart) August 13, 2025

As soon as Putin is in the room with Trump, Trump will turn subservient and weak.
— JES (@1liners) August 13, 2025

United in, SURRENDERING Ukraine lands with Russia suffering no repercussions whatsoever.

Just demanded surrender by Trump, and Ukraine having no choice but to say no.

Trump says, "I tried," and stops support just like that.

Art of the Deal Donald. 🤡
— J. Dub (Blue Checkmark) Forklift Certfd #FELLA🇺🇸 (@jomwilli) August 13, 2025

Remote Work Productivity Hacks
How to Make Money with AI Tools
AI for Beginners

My personal opinion: Trump will not remember on Friday what he said today and the weeks before, about pressure on Putin, sanctions, and support for Ukraine. I do not believe or trust Trump.
— Thomas Staeb (@thimo36) August 13, 2025

Remote Work Productivity Hacks
How to Make Money with AI Tools
AI for Beginners

Trump Issues Stark Warning to Russia Ahead of Putin Summit

Bessent Warns Europe It’s ‘Put Up or Shut Up’ Time on Russia Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged European nations to be prepared to get on board with higher tariffs on China and other nations that buy Russian energy, lamenting that he got a cool response when he floated the idea at a Group of Seven meeting earlier this year. .......... Bessent said sanctions on Russia “can go up” or “can be loosened” depending on the outcome of a meeting set for Friday between President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin. But the Europeans need to back the idea of harsher measures in any case. ........ “It’s put up or shut up time,” Bessent said. “We put secondary tariffs on the Indians for buying Russian oil. And I could see if things don’t go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up.” ......... The US, along with European nations, Japan and other countries have piled sanctions on Russia since the start of that country’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The European Union adopted its 18th package of sanctions on Russia in July, including on Russian energy. .......... Trump has imposed a 25% tariff on goods from India — set to take effect later this month — over the country’s purchases of Russian energy, in addition to a 25% base tariff. ..........

At a recent G-7 meeting in Canada, Bessent said he “looked at all the leaders around the table, and I said, is everyone at this table willing to put a 200% secondary tariff on China? And you know what? Everybody wanted to see what kind of shoes they were wearing.”

........ Bessent said that Trump “will make it clear to President Putin that all options are on the table.”

US Navy ship "expelled" from disputed waters, China's military says
Trump-Putin meeting: Trump issues threat to Russian leader

The thing Trump’s generals feared about him could now be arriving A big unknown with President Donald Trump’s move Monday to federalize the DC Metropolitan Police Department and deploy the National Guard in the nation’s capital is how much he wants a crackdown versus the appearance of one........ Trump’s mobilization of the military two months ago in Los Angeles seemed to fit the latter category. Maybe Trump just wants to look like he’s getting tough on crime in DC. ...........

it’s worth emphasizing that this is precisely the outcome that multiple top generals and military officials who served in Trump’s first term worried about – and warned about.

........ For years, they’ve cast Trump’s desire to dispatch the military on US soil as one of his most troubling tendencies – and even case-in-point evidence of his authoritarianism. ........... This issue was raised in one form or another by two Trump defense secretaries (Jim Mattis and Mark Esper), his top general (Mark Milley) and his chief of staff (John Kelly, also a retired general). All of them have cast this as a line that is not to be crossed and indicated they feared Trump would indeed cross it. Some even recalled multiple instances when Trump tried to do so or suggested it. .......... The flashpoint for many of their comments was the scene in June 2020 when federal law enforcement cleared Lafayette Square near the White Houe of racial-justice protesters. They did so right before Trump strolled through for a photo-op featuring both Milley and Esper. (Both later expressed regret for participating.) ....... Mattis responded with a blistering – and unusual, for him – statement that warned of what the scene portended. .......... “Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, DC, sets up a conflict — a false conflict — between the military and civilian society,” he said. “It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part.” ........ Mattis said the military should be used on US soil “only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors.” .......(Notably, Trump’s deployments of the military this summer – in Los Angeles and DC – came without requests from the governor and mayor, respectively.) ........ Esper has described a scene in which Trump asked him and Milley why the protesters couldn’t simply be shot “in the legs or something.” And in his 2022 book, he said a large part of his job that summer was “making sure to blunt or redirect any efforts that could politicize the military, misuse the force, or undermine the nation’s security.” .............. “And I think this issue of using the military on — to go after — American citizens is one of those things I think is a very, very bad thing — even to say it for political purposes to get elected — I think it’s a very, very bad thing, let alone actually doing it,” Kelly told the New York Times last year.......... In the same interview, Kelly mentioned Trump’s penchant for this while saying he met the definition of a fascist. ........... That’s a description Milley, too, has applied to Trump. And at one point, he reportedly so feared Trump’s willingness to misuse the military that he worried Trump might launch a coup after the 2020 election. (Trump denied ever considering such a thing.) .......... In their 2021 book, “I Alone Can Fix it,” Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker reported that Milley believed Trump was stoking unrest with his false claims about voter fraud in possible hope of being able to call in the military. (Rucker is now senior vice president for editorial strategy and news at CNN.) ......... “This is a Reichstag moment,” Milley reportedly told aides, recalling the episode the Nazis used as a pretext to cripple the opposition and consolidate power.

Remote Work Productivity Hacks
How to Make Money with AI Tools
AI for Beginners

Monday, July 28, 2025

28: Victor Gao

Remote Work Productivity Hacks
How to Make Money with AI Tools
AI for Beginners

China Proposes Global AI Governance Body: A Step Toward Inclusive AI Development

At the 2025 World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, Chinese Premier Li Qiang unveiled a bold proposal: the creation of a global AI cooperation organization, potentially headquartered in Shanghai. The announcement, made on July 26, 2025, signals China’s strategic intent to assume a leadership role in shaping the future of artificial intelligence (AI) governance—at a time of escalating technological rivalry with the United States.

This proposal lands at a pivotal moment in the global AI race, as countries increasingly compete not only in technological innovation but also in defining the rules, standards, and ethics of AI deployment.

A Call for Global Collaboration

In his keynote address, Premier Li emphasized the urgency of forging a multilateral framework for AI governance. Without coordinated international efforts, he warned, AI risks becoming an “exclusive game” dominated by a handful of powerful countries and tech giants. This was an implicit critique of the United States, which has recently tightened export controls on advanced AI chips and semiconductor tools to curb China’s progress.

Li contended that these bottlenecks—such as restricted chip access and barriers to global talent exchange—are stifling innovation, particularly in developing economies. In response, China has released a comprehensive 13-point action plan through its Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This plan calls for:

Establishing two new AI dialogue mechanisms under the United Nations;
Expanding open-source AI development;
Sharing foundational technologies, including semiconductors;
Enhancing cooperation with countries in the Global South.

Premier Li affirmed China’s readiness to offer “Chinese solutions” and “Chinese wisdom” to the international community—positioning AI not as a tool of power projection, but as a driver of inclusive global development.

Why This Proposal Matters

China’s proposal comes just days after the U.S. unveiled its own AI roadmap, centered on deregulation, market liberalization, and expanded exports to allied nations. The contrast between the two visions is stark:

The U.S. model champions private-sector innovation, commercial competitiveness, and minimal regulation;
The Chinese model advocates for state-guided multilateralism, equitable access, and technology-sharing with the developing world.

This ideological divergence reflects deeper global tensions: Who gets to write the rules of AI? And whose values will shape the digital infrastructure of the future?

China’s emphasis on open-source platforms and knowledge transfer is not merely altruistic—it’s also strategic. By aligning itself with the Global South, Beijing casts itself as an alternative to Western-centric governance models. Its growing partnerships with nations often excluded from AI rule-making forums reinforce this positioning. At WAIC, representatives from over 30 countries—including Russia, South Africa, Qatar, and South Korea—joined the AI roundtable, indicating China’s desire to assemble a broad-based coalition.

The Bigger Picture: China’s Growing AI Clout

Despite U.S. sanctions and technology export restrictions, China has made significant strides in developing homegrown AI capabilities. At WAIC 2025, companies like Huawei, Baidu, and Alibaba showcased cutting-edge models and infrastructure, including:

DeepSeek, China’s most advanced large language model (LLM), positioned as a rival to OpenAI’s GPT-4 and Google’s Gemini;
Over 40 LLMs and 60 intelligent robots, spanning sectors from manufacturing to elder care;
A showcase of 3,000 AI products, underscoring the depth of China’s innovation ecosystem.

The event drew over 1,000 senior officials, industry leaders, and scholars, reinforcing China’s ambition to serve as a central hub for AI dialogue, development, and diplomacy.

Yet challenges remain. Premier Li acknowledged the global AI governance landscape is “fragmented,” with clashing regulatory frameworks, siloed innovation ecosystems, and mounting geopolitical mistrust. The proposed Shanghai-based organization aims to address these challenges by:

Promoting interoperability in regulation;
Facilitating knowledge-sharing across borders;
Supporting open-source communities that reduce dependence on proprietary Western systems.

A Balancing Act: Opportunity or Power Play?

While China’s proposal appeals to many in the Global South, skepticism lingers—particularly among Western observers. Some fear the move is part of a broader attempt by Beijing to reshape global institutions in its image, echoing concerns seen with China’s expanding roles in the UN, WHO, and Belt and Road Initiative.

Posts on X (formerly Twitter) reflect this divide. Critics warn of China “infiltrating and exploiting” multilateral frameworks to assert digital dominance. Others, however, welcome the initiative as a long-overdue step toward de-Westernizing AI governance and giving emerging nations a seat at the table.

China’s official line emphasizes safety, pragmatism, and inclusivity. Premier Li stressed that the proposed organization would complement, not replace, existing frameworks—operating under the auspices of the United Nations to promote shared standards and responsible AI innovation. The plan builds on China’s earlier 2023 Global AI Governance Initiative and 2024 AI Capacity-Building Action Plan, both of which advocate for ethical, inclusive, and secure AI systems.

Looking Ahead: Toward a Multipolar AI Future?

China’s WAIC proposal marks a watershed moment in the global race to define AI’s future. By pushing for multilateral governance, open-source collaboration, and technology transfer, China is challenging the U.S.-centric model and offering an alternative narrative of AI as a global public good.

Whether the proposed AI cooperation body materializes—and how much influence it wields—will depend on China’s ability to build consensus across geopolitical lines. The initiative must prove that it can be both inclusive and effective, transparent yet innovative, and cooperative without becoming a vessel for national self-interest.

As the world’s two largest economies continue their high-stakes tech rivalry, one thing is clear: the future of AI cannot be entrusted to a single nation or ideology. It requires collective stewardship. China’s proposal has opened a new chapter in that story—one that could either redefine global AI governance or deepen the digital divide.

Sources

Financial Times
Reuters
CNBC
WIONews
Global Times
Tekedia
Observations from verified X (Twitter) accounts

Note: This blog post reflects information available as of July 28, 2025. Online opinions are provided for context and should not be interpreted as verified fact.

चीन का वैश्विक एआई गवर्नेंस संस्था का प्रस्ताव: समावेशी एआई विकास की ओर एक कदम

शंघाई में आयोजित 2025 वर्ल्ड आर्टिफिशियल इंटेलिजेंस कॉन्फ्रेंस (WAIC) में चीनी प्रधानमंत्री ली क़ियांग ने एक महत्वाकांक्षी प्रस्ताव पेश किया: एक वैश्विक एआई सहयोग संगठन की स्थापना, जिसकी संभावित रूप से शंघाई में मुख्यालय होगा। यह घोषणा, जो 26 जुलाई 2025 को की गई, इस बात का संकेत है कि चीन कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) के भविष्य के संचालन में नेतृत्व भूमिका निभाना चाहता है—ऐसे समय में जब तकनीकी प्रतिस्पर्धा विशेषकर अमेरिका के साथ चरम पर है।

यह प्रस्ताव एक ऐसे निर्णायक क्षण पर आया है जब देश केवल तकनीकी नवाचार में ही नहीं, बल्कि AI के नियमों, मानकों और नैतिकता को परिभाषित करने में भी होड़ कर रहे हैं।

वैश्विक सहयोग की पुकार

प्रधानमंत्री ली ने अपने मुख्य भाषण में एआई संचालन के लिए बहुपक्षीय ढांचे की आवश्यकता पर ज़ोर दिया। उन्होंने चेताया कि यदि समन्वित वैश्विक प्रयास नहीं हुए, तो एआई एक “विशेषाधिकार प्राप्त खेल” बन जाएगा, जिस पर केवल कुछ शक्तिशाली देशों और प्रौद्योगिकी कंपनियों का नियंत्रण होगा। यह अमेरिका की ओर एक स्पष्ट संकेत था, जिसने हाल ही में चीन की प्रगति को रोकने के लिए उन्नत AI चिप्स और अर्धचालक उपकरणों पर निर्यात नियंत्रण कड़े कर दिए हैं।

ली ने तर्क दिया कि चिप्स की आपूर्ति में बाधाएं और वैश्विक प्रतिभा आदान-प्रदान पर प्रतिबंध विशेष रूप से विकासशील देशों के लिए नवाचार को बाधित कर रहे हैं। इसके जवाब में, चीन के विदेश मंत्रालय ने एक 13-बिंदु कार्य योजना जारी की है, जिसमें निम्नलिखित का प्रस्ताव है:

संयुक्त राष्ट्र के अंतर्गत दो नए एआई संवाद तंत्रों की स्थापना;
ओपन-सोर्स एआई विकास का विस्तार;
सेमीकंडक्टर जैसी आधारभूत तकनीकों का साझा उपयोग;
वैश्विक दक्षिण (Global South) के साथ सहयोग बढ़ाना।

ली ने कहा कि चीन “अंतरराष्ट्रीय समुदाय को अधिक चीनी समाधान और चीनी बुद्धिमत्ता प्रदान करने के लिए तैयार है”—जिससे एआई को सत्ता का नहीं, बल्कि समावेशी विकास का साधन बताया गया।

यह प्रस्ताव क्यों महत्वपूर्ण है

चीन का यह प्रस्ताव उस समय आया है जब अमेरिका ने भी अपनी एआई रणनीति जारी की है, जो मुख्यतः नियंत्रण कम करने, बाज़ार-आधारित प्रतिस्पर्धा, और सहयोगी देशों को तकनीक निर्यात पर केंद्रित है। इन दोनों दृष्टिकोणों के बीच अंतर स्पष्ट है:

अमेरिकी मॉडल: निजी क्षेत्र की नवाचार क्षमता, प्रतिस्पर्धा और न्यूनतम नियमन पर आधारित;
चीनी मॉडल: राज्य-प्रेरित बहुपक्षीयता, समावेशिता और तकनीकी साझाकरण को प्राथमिकता देता है।

यह वैचारिक अंतर इस सवाल को जन्म देता है: AI के नियम कौन बनाएगा? और किन मूल्यों के आधार पर?

चीन की ओपन-सोर्स तकनीक और ज्ञान साझाकरण पर ज़ोर केवल परोपकार नहीं है—यह रणनीतिक भी है। वैश्विक दक्षिण के देशों के साथ जुड़कर चीन खुद को पश्चिमी प्रभुत्व के विकल्प के रूप में प्रस्तुत कर रहा है। WAIC सम्मेलन में रूस, दक्षिण अफ्रीका, कतर, और दक्षिण कोरिया सहित 30 से अधिक देशों के प्रतिनिधियों की भागीदारी इस वैश्विक गठजोड़ की पुष्टि करती है।

बड़ी तस्वीर: चीन की बढ़ती एआई शक्ति

हालांकि अमेरिका द्वारा लगाए गए तकनीकी प्रतिबंध लागू हैं, फिर भी चीन ने घरेलू एआई समाधानों के विकास में उल्लेखनीय प्रगति की है। WAIC 2025 में, हुवावे, बायडू और अलीबाबा जैसी कंपनियों ने अत्याधुनिक मॉडल प्रस्तुत किए, जिनमें शामिल हैं:

DeepSeek: चीन का सबसे उन्नत LLM (लार्ज लैंग्वेज मॉडल), जिसे OpenAI के GPT-4 और Google के Gemini का प्रतिस्पर्धी माना जा रहा है;
40 से अधिक LLMs और 60 स्मार्ट रोबोट, जो निर्माण से लेकर बुजुर्ग देखभाल तक की सेवाओं में प्रयुक्त होते हैं;
3,000 से अधिक एआई उत्पादों का प्रदर्शन, जो चीन के नवाचार पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र की व्यापकता को दर्शाता है।

इस सम्मेलन में 1,000 से अधिक वरिष्ठ अधिकारी, उद्योग विशेषज्ञ, और विद्वान शामिल हुए—जो चीन की वैश्विक एआई कूटनीति के केंद्र में होने की महत्वाकांक्षा को दर्शाता है।

फिर भी, चुनौतियाँ बनी हुई हैं। ली ने स्वीकार किया कि वैश्विक एआई संचालन "खंडित" है—जहां विभिन्न देशों की नीतियाँ, नियम और मानक एक-दूसरे से मेल नहीं खाते। शंघाई स्थित प्रस्तावित संस्था इन चुनौतियों से निपटने के लिए एक वैश्विक मंच बनने का प्रयास करेगी:

नीति समन्वय को बढ़ावा देना;
सीमापार ज्ञान साझा करना;
ओपन-सोर्स समुदायों को प्रोत्साहित करना, जिससे कुछ बड़ी कंपनियों पर निर्भरता कम हो सके।

संतुलन का प्रयास: अवसर या शक्ति विस्तार?

हालांकि चीन का यह प्रस्ताव वैश्विक दक्षिण के लिए आकर्षक है, पश्चिमी देशों में संदेह बना हुआ है। कुछ आलोचक इसे चीन के वैश्विक संस्थाओं पर नियंत्रण बढ़ाने के प्रयास के रूप में देखते हैं—जैसा कि संयुक्त राष्ट्र, WHO, और बेल्ट एंड रोड इनिशिएटिव में देखा गया।

X (पूर्व में ट्विटर) पर पोस्ट इस विभाजन को दर्शाते हैं। कुछ यूजर्स ने चेतावनी दी कि बीजिंग इस संस्था का उपयोग वैश्विक प्रभाव विस्तार के लिए कर सकता है। वहीं, अन्य इसे एक सकारात्मक कदम मानते हैं जो पश्चिम-केंद्रित शासन मॉडल को चुनौती देता है।

ली ने कहा कि प्रस्तावित संस्था संयुक्त राष्ट्र के अंतर्गत काम करेगी और मौजूदा प्रयासों को “पूरक” के रूप में समर्थन देगी। यह 2023 के ग्लोबल एआई गवर्नेंस इनिशिएटिव और 2024 के एआई क्षमता निर्माण कार्ययोजना से जुड़ा हुआ है, जो समावेशी, नैतिक और सुरक्षित एआई विकास की वकालत करते हैं।

आगे की राह: क्या एआई का भविष्य बहुध्रुवीय होगा?

चीन का WAIC प्रस्ताव वैश्विक एआई शासन की दिशा में एक महत्वपूर्ण मोड़ है। बहुपक्षीय सहयोग, ओपन-सोर्स विकास और तकनीकी साझाकरण को बढ़ावा देकर चीन, अमेरिका-केंद्रित एआई शासन की धारणा को चुनौती दे रहा है।

यह प्रस्ताव वास्तव में कितना प्रभावशाली साबित होगा, यह इस पर निर्भर करेगा कि चीन कितनी सफलतापूर्वक विभिन्न देशों के बीच विश्वास और सहमति बना पाता है। संस्था को यह सिद्ध करना होगा कि वह समावेशी होने के साथ-साथ प्रभावी, पारदर्शी और नवोन्मेषी भी है—और यह केवल चीन के हितों तक सीमित नहीं है।

जैसे-जैसे अमेरिका और चीन के बीच तकनीकी प्रतिस्पर्धा बढ़ती जा रही है, एक बात स्पष्ट है: AI का भविष्य केवल एक देश या विचारधारा के भरोसे नहीं छोड़ा जा सकता। इसके लिए वैश्विक सामूहिक नेतृत्व आवश्यक है। चीन का यह प्रस्ताव उस दिशा में एक नया अध्याय खोलता है—जो या तो वैश्विक सहयोग को जन्म देगा या फिर एक और भू-राजनीतिक टकराव का मंच बन जाएगा।

स्रोत:

Financial Times
Reuters
CNBC
WIONews
Global Times
Tekedia
X (ट्विटर) पर टिप्पणियाँ

टिप्पणी: यह ब्लॉग पोस्ट 28 जुलाई 2025 तक की उपलब्ध जानकारी पर आधारित है। X (ट्विटर) पर व्यक्त विचार संदर्भ के लिए प्रस्तुत हैं और सत्यापित प्रमाण नहीं माने जाने चाहिए।

Watch the full video here:https://t.co/S18moxrIlx
— Presearch (@presearchnews) July 28, 2025

For the first time, two of Israel’s best-known human rights groups, B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights — Israel, said on Monday that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. https://t.co/XFFgaDYq02
— Liam Stack (@liamstack) July 28, 2025

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

23: China

Liquid Computing: The Future of Human-Tech Symbiosis
Velocity Money: Crypto, Karma, and the End of Traditional Economics
The Next Decade of Biotech: Convergence, Innovation, and Transformation
Beyond Motion: How Robots Will Redefine The Art Of Movement
ChatGPT For Business: A Workbook
Becoming an AI-First Organization
Quantum Computing: Applications And Implications
Challenges In AI Safety
AI-Era Social Network: Reimagined for Truth, Trust & Transformation

Remote Work Productivity Hacks
How to Make Money with AI Tools
AI for Beginners

Headline of the Day: Coal Plant Closure Results in Immediate Drop in ER Visits, Study Shows https://t.co/kSQWYnY89o
— Rick McGuire (@RickMcGuire1) July 23, 2025