Showing posts with label Larry Page. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Larry Page. Show all posts

Monday, March 16, 2015

Elon Musk And Larry Page

Elon Musk wants to go to Mars. Larry Page acts like he is already on Mars. You can't see him anywhere.


Jack Ma And Elon Musk


Jack Ma and Elon Musk are the two most exciting entrepreneurs on the planet right now. They come from two different ends. Jack Ma is coming from the China end, the Third World end, the Global South end. Elon Musk is coming from the rich country end where he is going to beat the bullet train and go to Mars, and what have you.

Elon Musk is more exciting than Larry Page right now. As to why Larry Page will not sink 20 billion into taking every human being online TODAY beats me! Google's search advantage will not last forever. And so it needs to cash it now, today.

If the smartwatch takes off, Tim Cook will have proven himself. And Steve Jobs will have proven himself. Jobs liked to say the most important thing he built is the company Apple itself, not the Mac, not the iPhone. Although I am not convinced the smartwatch alone can take Apple to being a trillion dollar company. I am on record saying that company is Google. But Larry Page has been a partially absent CEO. A CEO needs to be seen, needs to be heard, like Marissa Mayer was visible when she was with Google. Most of your talk is consumed internally, even when they are publicly made. People inside your company are watching.

But then I was not excited about the iPad when it came along. I am an active user. I don't passively read. I was like, no keyboard? Get out of here. But the iPad has been a monumental product. Right now I feel like the smartwatch is not for me. Just give me a phone with a battery that lasts twice as long. And I am happy. I actually like not having something around my wrist. I like that sense of freedom. My phone is my watch. And it is a smart one too. It is not for me, that does not mean it is not for other people. I will wait and watch.

Right now I am thinking the smartwatch is Apple's Google Glass. It will not die, but it will not go mainstream.


Monday, July 14, 2014

Third Time Watching: Vinod, Larry, Sergey

I am watching this video for the third time now, the second time today. These just so happen to be three of the most fascinating people in tech.



The Google Guys seem to have some First World Problems. The world is nowhere close to an age of abundance. Maybe by 2050 if we get our act together. But now? No way.

Google failed at health, when it first tried. But I hope it is not done. If it can do to health what it is trying to do to transportation, that would be monumental.

Larry saying something about the government being illogical about spectrum. I feel that way strongly about immigration. And quite a few other things.

If being a CEO is about photogenics, Sergei is better media feed than Larry. There's ethics, there's photogenics. But Larry is awesome. In terms of sheer impact, Steve Jobs has nothing on Larry Page.

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Getting Rid Of The Steering Wheel

English: Left to right, Eric E. Schmidt, Serge...
English: Left to right, Eric E. Schmidt, Sergey Brin and Larry Page of Google Polski: Od lewej do prawej: Eric E. Schmidt, Sergey Brin i Larry Page z firmy Google (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A self driving car should have a lot more room than a car you have to steer around. You tell the microwave oven to heat up something for three minutes. During those three minutes, you are out and about doing your own things. You don't spend those three minutes "steering" the oven. A firewood oven is another story. You have to keep steering the fire. You have to stay watchful.

You should be able to instruct your self driving car as to your destination, then you should be able to forget the car. Finally Google is doing it. And finally the Google Car looks like the Nano car of India. A self driving car should also be smaller, no? A two seater self driving car would be awesome. If you think about it, the very concept of parking is a ridiculous idea. Now that Google has built its own car, it should build its own app. Google should not sell these cars. Google should build and own them and rent them out to people, on a per ride, per day, or per month basis. And those rates ought to be ridiculously cheaper because, well, if five people are paying for the same house, the cost per person should be five times less, no? The car drops you off at a destination, and then instead of going to look for a parking space, it goes off to pick up the next person. It keeps moving.

Airplane ride is safer than riding a bicycle, by a wide margin, but "common sense" tells you otherwise. Driverless cars are similarly safer to human driven cars. Self driving cars don't encounter fatigue. They don't get drunk. They are equally vigilant in all directions. They are looking in the front, and in the back, and on the sides, like we are looking in the front. They can look up weather information, and road conditions updates, and gas station information without taking time away from driving. They don't get distracted when others talk.

The concept of human organized car pooling, very inefficient in the first place, goes out the window. The car's app does the car pooling for you.

I would love to go on cross country rides on this Google Car. I would not miss a beat from working. It would be like I am in a moving office, with beautiful views, and I am online and making phone calls as I please. People don't need to know where I am.

A computer with internet access is not just a computer plus internet. It is a new thing. Similarly a self driving car is not just a car that drives by itself. It is a new thing.

Commutes will no longer be considered wasted time. The beginning of your commute is when you start work. And you could choose to end your work day at the end of your commute. That would make more time for personal stuff like family.

A maximum speed limit of 25 miles per hour means this is just for city driving, and I am happy, because I live in New York City. But in future it will also have to be built for highway driving. There you go with the wind, I mean the speed limit. Sometimes that can be 75 miles per hour.

Electric power will mean little to no driving noise. You will enjoy your music more.

The car should also be designed to automatically takes pictures in the event of a crash. So seconds before an impact the picture taking starts, and stays on for a minute or so, so a picture every five seconds perhaps. And there should be a black box. And any crash should automatically generate a 911 call. The call would transmit the crash location.

The Google Car is a startup. But this effort could not have been bootstrapped. You needed a company with deep pockets to attempt this.

Highway driving is less tricky than city driving. So it is perplexing that the speed limit on the car is 25 mph. I guess they want to tackle hard first.

Google plans to start in Detroit. Larry Page is from Michigan. Google will kill the car companies that the Great Recession was not able to, and that Obama worked so hard to keep afloat.

Google Car will mean less pressure on the roads. It will mean less pressure on the planet, because these are clean cars. These are carbon zero cars. These cars you can ride in as much as you want and not even feel guilty.

This car would transform New York City. Nothing has been able to compete with the subway in NYC. I think this car could. Imagine a NYC with 10,000 of these Google cars, all owned by Google, that you access with an app, that are cheaper than train rides even, that show up within a minute of your asking for it. The city's efficiency would go up. People would live by the minute. There would be no need to plan ahead of time. Like Google Now tells me I should now leave if I want to be on time for my next meeting. Imagine that Google Now that is integrated to the Google Car that I subscribe to (yes, I want to subscribe, not buy, I don't want to do oil changes, among other things, and I want my car to keep changing, changing cars like changing clothes). Google Now will say, you should leave now for your next meeting, and your car will be outside there for you in 40 seconds. And if you want half price on the ride, your car will pick up someone else at the corner of 18th Street and Seventh Avenue. Google Now might even send me the Google+ page for that person, and next thing you know I have a new contact. We even talked for five minutes in the car before I got off for my meeting.

This is Google taking over transportation like Google took over search. There is no competition in sight. Moving information is important. But then moving people is also important.

The idea is not cars. The idea is transportation. And there Google should make an attempt at the fastest/cheapest mode of transportation. Ships in the ocean are cheaper than trains which are cheaper than buses and trucks and cars. Bullet trains that fly a few inches in the air are cheaper than trains that grind on the iron. Also, a train carrying 1,000 passengers will be cheaper than a car carrying two passengers, cheaper per person that is.
Top ten fastest trains in the world Shanghai Maglev tops the list with its maximum operational speed of 430km/h and average speed of 251kmph.

11 Incredibly Fast Trains That Leave America In The Dust Shanghai's magnetic levitation train hits 270 mph..... American rail travelers will have to settle for Acela trains, which hit 150 mph. ..... Shangai's magnetic levitation (maglev) train floats above its track thanks to powerful magnets. It covers an 18-mile trip from downtown to the airport in just 8 minutes, hitting 270 mph. ..... apan is known for the bullet train, so it's no surprise that the Shinkansen train has a top speed of 275 mph. It is nicknamed the "Duck-Billed Platypus" for its odd-looking, aerodynamic nose...... The top dog in the world of fast trains is China, which broke the 300 mph barrier with the CRH380A. The 302 mph top speed makes this the fastest legal way to travel by land.
Could Google do 300 miles per hour? How about 350? At that point you are giving air travel serious competition. There is so much more to see near the earth's surface. A train that connects San Francisco to Denver to Chicago to New York City, another that connects Boston to NYC to DC would create a Silicon Backbone. People would be on the train and will keep working.

Trucking companies killed trains in this country. Trains are superior to trucks. Maybe they need to make a comeback. And while you are at it, also do campaign finance reform so that trucking companies of the future do not kill the trains of the future. China does not only have bullet trains, it also has campaign finance reform. Coincidence?

You get off the train and the Google Car is waiting for you, because you did not sign up for Google Train or Google Car, but for Google Transportation. It is a point A to point B proposition, not a NYC to LA proposition.

From there you also have to move to the air and then to space. The fastest way to go from NYC to Beijing might be through space. How far is the moon? You become a dot com millionaire because you want to make a trip to the moon, and you had internet access the entire time. People were still emailing you. You were taking selfies on the moon and sharing on Instagram in real time. And you got a lot of likes. Cheap popularity? No, expensive popularity.

There was one suggestion that Apple should buy Tesla. Maybe it is Google, maybe it is Google that would buy Tesla. Musk would be my idea of an acqui-hire!



Google Transportation will compete with Google Search in turning Google into a trillion dollar company.



Look Ma, No Hands: Sergey Brin’s GoogleCar Has No Steering Wheel, No Brakes
The two-seat, all-electric autonomous automobile is remarkable mainly for the features it doesn’t have, such as a steering wheel, a dashboard, and a brake pedal. “We took a look from the ground up and asked what should self driving cars be like?” Brin said ..... Nadella demonstrated a new Skype tool that can almost instantly translate a live conversation into different languages. “This has been a dream of humanity,” Nadella said. The feature, called Skype Translator, will begin rolling out later this year .... Brin said that creating a car from scratch allowed Google to focus on building in safety measures, such as a foam bumper and a flexible, plastic windshield, and to install a 25 miles-per-hour speed limit for pedestrian safety. ..... He described riding in one of the vehicles on a test track and called it relaxing: “Within seconds I was doing my e-mail. I forgot I was there. It reminded me of catching a chairlift by yourself. There’s a bit of solitude.” ..... He imagines a fleet of autonomous cars that users can summon like taxis and ride to their destinations. Such a network of roving robot cars will make owning a car less important and allow cities to make better use of land that is currently devoted to parking lots and fleets of vehicles that sit idle for most of the day...... The self-driving car project is a testament to the influence Google’s co-founder still wields at the company, despite the fact that he says he has largely removed himself from decisions affecting other parts of the business. Unlike other projects in the X lab, like efforts to spread wireless Internet access around the world via high-altitude balloons, and Google Glass, which arguably makes surfing the Web and taking photos easier, the driverless car project does not appear to affect any of Google’s current businesses. “The project is about changing the world for people who are not well-served by transportation today,” Brin said. ..... driverless cars are “significantly safer” than vehicles with a human ..... at the wheel.
Google is to start building its own self-driving cars
The car will have a stop-go button but no controls, steering wheel or pedals. ..... the cars had the ability to "improve people's lives by transforming mobility"..... Google says it expects its self-drive cars to be on the road 'within a year'.... The company plans to build a fleet of around 200 of the cars in Detroit, with the hope of using them as an autonomous technology test bed.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Google And Hardware

Image representing Larry Page as depicted in C...
Image via CrunchBase
Google has been a software company. The king of search sits at the center of all things web. I love Google like some people love Apple. When it first came out I remember embedding the Google search engine on my personal homepage which was hosted on Yahoo’s hot domain Geocities, by now defunct. I have watched it as it has grown. It has been amazing to me that although Google has become big, like really big, it has not stopped innovating. When small innovative companies become big, they slow down. But when Google became big it just started innovating at large scales, it simply started tackling large problems that only the resourceful can.

Social came after search and it can be argued Facebook got that one. But mobile came after social and Google’s Android rules the roost. Big Data is widely perceived as one of the next big things and Google seems well positioned for that phase as well. Robotics is all the rage and Google is making acquisitions left and right.

We have all heard of driverless cars and Google Glass. The Glass is already here, the car is only a few years away. One thing you notice real quick is the dominant software company in the world – used to be Microsoft in the Windows era – is fast becoming a hardware company.

Only a few years back Google was so adamant about staying away from hardware that when it felt vendors were not doing right by its smartphone concept, it brought forth the Nexus line of phones but under the aegis of outside vendors. Even the acquisition of the phone company Motorola was a compulsion. Google really wanted the patents Motorola had to dig in with Android that was being attacked on all sides, primarily by Apple. I never thought Steve Jobs had a case. You can’t copyright the Personal Computer concept, and you can’t copyright the smartphone concept.

But by now the reluctance is gone and Google is unabashed about being a hardware company. What happened? I think what happened was it is not like Google one day decided to give Dell a run for the money and started building PCs as well. What happened was smartness caught up with hardware. Minus the smartness hardware was pretty much junk to Google. But with the smarts every inch of hardware can feel like software. It is the difference between a tongue and a thumb. The tongue, it can be argued, is smart, it is sensitive.

Just like Big Data is right round the corner, the Internet Of Things is right round the corner. And that Internet Of Things is all about smart hardware. Your smoke alarm is smart, your refrigerator is smart, your garage door is smart, your toaster is smart, your car sure is smart. You end up with a smart home. You know the difference between a dumb phone and a smart phone. Extrapolate that and you get the idea. Your home currently is a dumb home.

It is not a sure thing that Google will dominate the next big things like it has dominated search and mobile. But it sure has a clear shot at it. It is poised to be one of the dominant names in both Big Data and the Internet Of Things. As to if will be the top name, the dominant name, that question is up in the air. It is usually extremely hard for the company that dominated one phase of innovation to also dominate the next one. Microsoft dominated the PC, but it did not go on to dominate the web.

It is amazing to me that Larry Page is no Steve Jobs. Larry Page hardly ever makes news, but Google is in the news on a daily basis. Steve Jobs was a dominant personality made for the media. Page stays in the background. But Page’s footprint will likely end up larger at the end of the day, perhaps substantially larger. I think Apple’s best days are behind it, but Google just might end up becoming the world’s first trillion dollar company. But if it does, it will have to hit that mark before 2020. It not, it will have missed it.

That is an interesting proposition because we are living through a time when the relationship between the state and the individual is being redefined. Companies like Google are all about empowering the individual all over the world. All Google users are global citizens at some level, to some degree.

Steve Jobs of course started out his journey saying you have to do both software and hardware. He was proven wrong as Microsoft took the lead by being a purely software company. And then he was proven right as Apple overtook Microsoft in market value on the strength of its iPhone sales. Perhaps the PC was not the right vehicle for the vision. Only a smartphone accorded that fusion.

Robotics should move from the science fiction space to our living rooms in a few short years. Amazon wants to deliver your orders with drones that will fly from their warehouses to our front yards. Giants like Google and Amazon are already competing in that robotics space.

So, yes, the number one software company in the world, Google, now is working to become also the top hardware company in the world. Where does that put Samsung?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, October 07, 2013

Larry Page Has Been Underrated


Not Google. Google has been rated just fine. But not Larry Page. When we think of Larry Page, we don't think of him in terms of Steve Jobs or Bill Gates. Steve Jobs is even more mysterious than Bill Gates. Jobs had the theatrics done right. There was plenty of essence to him, but he was the master of how the media plays itself out. Compared to that Larry Page is boring. He does not have much of a stage presence. But the guy is a tech genius. And Google is the bright star in the sky.

I have felt this a long time. I am on record at this blog saying Larry Page should have been the Google CEO the entire time. If it were not for Larry, Google might have missed the Android boat altogether.

Now there is an article that supports my long held feelings towards Larry Page. Heck, compared to Larry Page even Marissa Mayer has more media wattage.

I think Larry Page will be truly appreciated when the Google Car hits the road in droves, universal internet access becomes a reality, gigabit broadband becomes the norm across the US, and we are all not ageing so fast no more. Give the guy until 2020 to give us a trillion dollar company.

Larry Page's Google Rules the Digital World
When Bill Gates was 40 he had just released Windows 95. When Steve Jobs was 40 he was still in exile at NeXT and Pixar. At age 40, Page is worth about $25 billion, and his days as Google CEO are just beginning.

Enhanced by Zemanta