Pages

Showing posts with label llm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label llm. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 21, 2025

Physically Specific Intelligence



Summary: “Physically Specific Intelligence” as the Next Phase of AI

This thesis argues that instead of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), the next major leap for AI will come from physically specific intelligence — AI systems deeply integrated into the physical world through robotics and automation.

  1. AI’s Hype Cycle:
    AI is entering the “trough of disillusionment.” Despite cooling hype, this is the best time for serious builders and investors to enter the field as weaker players exit.

  2. Dual Nature of AI:
    AI is both incredibly powerful (search, summarization, visualization, prototyping) and frustrating (spam, scams, low-quality content). Many focus on its flaws, missing the bigger picture.

  3. Unexpected Plateau:
    Current large language models (LLMs) have peaked at tasks like advanced search and summarization. That’s transformative (disrupting Google), but still far from true reasoning or creativity.

  4. Why Models Plateaued:
    LLMs “repeat” rather than “think.” They are downstream — synthesizing human text — not generating truly novel insights. Their main limitation is the need for human prompting and verification.

  5. Physical vs. Digital AI:
    Digital AI operates “middle-to-middle,” while physical AI (robots) can perform end-to-end tasks. Self-driving cars exemplify this: they sense, decide, and act autonomously.

  6. Rise of Physically Specific Intelligence:
    The greatest near-term progress will occur in clearly defined, high-value physical tasks — like driving, delivery, manufacturing, and household robotics. China is already advancing rapidly here.

  7. Consensus Reality Advantage:
    Physical-world AI (via robotics and sensors) gathers consistent real data through shared sensing (e.g., SLAM). Digital AI, however, ingests inconsistent or fake text increasingly polluted by AI-generated content.

  8. The Physical Learning Network:
    Millions of robots collectively mapping the real world can share and improve upon each other’s data — forming a grounded, verifiable base of reality-based intelligence.

  9. Industrial and Consumer Impact:
    Factory robots embody the industrial side of physically specific intelligence. On the consumer side, it will manifest as “a garden of intelligent things” — cars, drones, home devices, and robots that interact naturally with humans.

  10. Conclusion:
    Until major algorithmic breakthroughs occur, the next big wave in AI isn’t abstract AGI but real-world, embodied intelligence — machines that understand and act within our shared physical environment.





LLMs Are Just Getting Started: The Coming Age of Vertical Intelligence

For all the noise about “AI plateauing,” the truth is that Large Language Models (LLMs) are barely in their infancy. What we’re seeing today — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and others — represents the general-purpose, broad-strokes phase of digital intelligence. But the next era, the vertical LLM era, will make today’s generalists look primitive.

Far from being an argument against physical or robotic AI, the rise of vertical LLMs complements it — forming the cognitive backbone of the AI revolution across industries, sciences, and societies.


1. The Misconception of the Plateau

Critics claim LLMs have peaked: they summarize, search, and draft well, but fail to “think” or innovate. But that claim overlooks how every technological paradigm begins. The first web browsers looked unimpressive compared to what came a decade later. The first mobile apps were clunky before the app ecosystem exploded.

Similarly, today’s general LLMs are foundational platforms — the equivalent of the early internet. They have reached saturation at the horizontal level, but not vertically. The true explosion will happen when we stop trying to make one model do everything and instead make thousands of models each do one thing brilliantly.


2. The Vertical LLM Revolution

Vertical LLMs are specialized models trained intensively on specific domains — medicine, law, finance, logistics, agriculture, energy, education, and so on.

A vertical LLM doesn’t just know about its field; it lives in it. It understands the jargon, the workflows, the exceptions, and the tacit knowledge that domain experts carry.

Imagine:

  • MedGPT, trained on millions of clinical notes and radiology reports, diagnosing with contextual awareness beyond any human physician’s recall.

  • EduGPT, which understands every curriculum in the world, teaching any subject in any language or dialect, adapting to each student’s style.

  • LawGPT, parsing legislation, precedent, and contracts with the precision of a seasoned jurist.

  • AgriGPT, optimized for local soil, weather, and crop data, guiding farmers across geographies.

This is not science fiction. It’s an inevitable next step — because domain-specific models will simply outperform general ones where stakes are high.


3. The Power of Depth Over Breadth

General LLMs are extraordinary at breadth — they can hold conversations across philosophy, programming, and poetry. But true intelligence in human civilization has always come from depth: from the scientist who spent decades studying one element, or the historian who mastered one period.

Vertical LLMs replicate that depth at scale. By focusing training on narrow, high-quality datasets and using continual fine-tuning, these models will not only surpass general LLMs in accuracy but also in reasoning within their field.

Just as specialists outperform general practitioners in surgery, vertical models will outperform ChatGPT-like models in real-world decision-making.


4. Complementarity with Physical AI

This is not an argument against physical intelligence — rather, it’s a partnership. Physical AI (robots, self-driving cars, drones) acts in the real world; vertical LLMs think about the real world.

A self-driving truck may navigate a road autonomously, but when that road is blocked, it may consult a LogisticsGPT to reroute intelligently. A surgical robot may execute precise movements, but it’s guided by a MedGPT that interprets scans, monitors vitals, and suggests procedures.

Physical AI provides agency; vertical LLMs provide judgment. One acts; the other advises. Together they create complete, end-to-end intelligence loops — cognitive and kinetic, digital and physical.


5. The Data Renaissance

Another reason LLMs are far from finished: we’re just entering a data renaissance. As more sectors digitize, the availability of structured, proprietary, high-fidelity data will explode.

The next decade won’t be about scraping the public web; it’ll be about training on private, permissioned, and verified datasets: hospital archives, industrial logs, supply chains, and research repositories. This shift from public “slop” to verified “truth” will massively improve model performance and reliability.

Whereas the internet was chaotic, the vertical data ecosystems will be curated, regulated, and contextual. That’s where LLMs will truly begin to understand rather than merely predict.


6. The Rise of the Cognitive Stack

The future enterprise stack won’t be defined by databases or spreadsheets — but by LLMs as reasoning engines. Each organization will have a cognitive core:

  • A core model (company-specific LLM) trained on internal knowledge.

  • Vertical assistants embedded into workflows (finance, HR, marketing, compliance).

  • Physical interfaces (robots, drones, IoT devices) carrying out the recommendations.

This stack — cognitive + physical — will redefine productivity. A factory might run on IndustrialGPT, a hospital on CareGPT, and a city on CivicGPT. The end of “software as a service” will give way to “intelligence as infrastructure.”


7. LLMs as Engines of Discovery

One of the most underestimated powers of LLMs is their potential for discovery. When vertical models are fine-tuned on experimental data — in chemistry, materials science, genomics, or energy — they will start generating hypotheses humans have never thought of.

Already, AI is designing new drugs, optimizing molecular structures, and discovering mathematical proofs. These are glimpses of what comes when language models are fused with symbolic reasoning, graph learning, and simulation engines.

Vertical intelligence will make LLMs not just describers of reality, but inventors within it.


8. A Thousand New Minds

We will soon have thousands of specialized minds — each an LLM trained for a specific domain, geography, or culture. They’ll converse with each other, trade insights, and collaborate across industries.

General-purpose LLMs like GPT will serve as the “language bridge” between them — the digital equivalent of a lingua franca. Together, they’ll form a planetary web of intelligence: distributed, specialized, and always learning.


9. The Real AGI Will Be a Network, Not a Node

If AGI ever emerges, it won’t be from one monolithic brain but from the networked coordination of many vertical intelligences. Each model — from medical to mechanical — will contribute expertise. The emergent intelligence will come from their interplay.

The future of AI, then, is neither purely digital nor purely physical. It’s hybrid. It’s a world where intelligence flows — from chips to circuits, from text to steel, from neurons to motors.


10. The Beginning, Not the End

So, no — LLMs haven’t plateaued. They’ve just crossed their first threshold. We’re moving from general chatbots to expert systems that can transform entire industries.

The coming decade won’t be defined by a single “smart” AI, but by millions of purpose-built minds quietly revolutionizing how we work, learn, heal, grow, and build.

General AI lit the spark. Vertical AI will light the world.





Thursday, June 05, 2025

Will Scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) Lead To Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)


Here is a balanced argument presenting both sides of the ongoing debate around whether scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) will lead to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI):


Argument 1: LLMs Are Not the Path to AGI

  1. Statistical Mimicry ≠ Understanding
    LLMs are fundamentally pattern-recognition engines trained to predict the next token. They do not “understand” meaning, intentions, or goals. They simulate reasoning without possessing it, and lack grounding in real-world context, embodiment, or sensory experience—critical aspects of general intelligence.

  2. Lack of Agency and Autonomy
    LLMs do not initiate goals, pursue objectives, or act independently in the world. AGI requires agency: the ability to plan, adapt, and act toward long-term goals across environments, which LLMs are not designed to do.

  3. Catastrophic Forgetting and No Long-Term Memory
    LLMs do not learn continually or adapt dynamically post-training. Their knowledge is static, baked into weights. AGI requires lifelong learning, updating beliefs in real time, and managing long-term memory—which current LLM architectures do not support robustly.

  4. Scaling Laws Show Diminishing Returns
    While LLM performance improves with scale, there's growing evidence of diminishing returns. Bigger models are more expensive, harder to align, and less interpretable. Simply scaling does not necessarily yield fundamentally new cognitive abilities.

  5. Missing Cognitive Structures
    Human cognition involves hierarchical planning, self-reflection, causal reasoning, and abstraction—abilities that are not emergent from LLM scaling alone. Without structured models of the world, LLMs cannot reason causally or build mental models akin to humans.


Argument 2: Scaling LLMs Will Lead to AGI

  1. Emergent Capabilities with Scale
    Empirical evidence from models like GPT-4 and Gemini suggests that new abilities (e.g. multi-step reasoning, code synthesis, analogical thinking) emerge as models grow. These emergent behaviors hint at generalization capacity beyond narrow tasks.

  2. Language as a Core Substrate of Intelligence
    Human intelligence is deeply tied to language. LLMs, by mastering language at scale, begin to internalize vast swaths of human knowledge, logic, and even cultural norms—forming the foundation of general reasoning.

  3. Unified Architecture Advantage
    LLMs are general-purpose, trainable on diverse tasks without specialized wiring. This flexibility suggests that a sufficiently scaled LLM, especially when integrated with memory, tools, and embodiment, can approximate AGI behavior.

  4. Tool Use and World Interaction Bridges the Gap
    With external tools (e.g. search engines, agents, calculators, APIs) and memory systems, LLMs can compensate for their limitations. This hybrid “LLM + tools” model resembles the way humans use external aids (notebooks, computers) to enhance intelligence.

  5. Scaling Accelerates Research Feedback Loops
    As LLMs improve, they assist in code generation, scientific discovery, and AI research itself. This recursive self-improvement may catalyze rapid progress toward AGI, where LLMs design better models and architectures.


Conclusion

The disagreement hinges on whether general intelligence is emergent through scale and data, or whether it requires fundamentally new paradigms (like symbolic reasoning, embodiment, or causal models). In practice, future AGI may not be a pure LLM, but a scaled LLM as the core substrate, integrated with complementary modules—blending both arguments.





Friday, May 30, 2025

Memory Is the Real Moat—But It Should Belong to Us


Memory Is the Real Moat—But It Should Belong to Us

In the AI age, the most valuable resource isn’t data—it’s your memory. Not biological memory, of course, but the contextual breadcrumbs you've left behind across a growing constellation of LLM-powered apps. Every prompt, every reply, every fine-tuning of tone, style, and preference—this is the memory that makes an AI assistant yours. And this is becoming the most powerful moat large AI platforms have.

But herein lies the dilemma: this memory is locked inside walled gardens. ChatGPT knows your writing style. Claude remembers your schedule. Perplexity learns your research interests. But none of them talk to each other. And none of them give you full control.

A Moat for Them, a Trap for Us?

From a platform perspective, memory is a dream. It deepens engagement, raises switching costs, and feeds into a virtuous loop: the more you use the app, the better it gets, the harder it becomes to leave. But for users—especially professionals relying on AI across tasks, tools, and devices—this creates real friction.

Imagine writing part of a novel in ChatGPT, managing your tasks with an AI assistant, and analyzing documents with a third app. Each has a different slice of your memory, with no unified context. You end up re-teaching, re-uploading, and re-reminding each app what the others already know. It’s like having a dozen brilliant interns who don’t speak to each other.

The Case for Memory Portability

This is why the idea of “Plaid for memory” is so compelling. In fintech, Plaid unlocked financial data portability, enabling users to control how and where their information is used. Why can’t we do the same with AI memory?

Imagine a permissioned memory layer that sits above the AI apps—a personal data vault you control. Apps would need your consent to read from or write to your memory. You could revoke access anytime. Want to switch from ChatGPT to Claude? Your memory comes with you. Want your task app to learn from your writing habits? Grant it access. Want to share your professional context with a new assistant agent? One click.

This idea turns memory from a moat into a market. And in doing so, empowers users rather than platforms.

What Would It Take?

  • Standards for contextual data: Just like there are APIs for calendars or contacts, we’ll need standards for memory—conversations, task histories, preferences, tone, etc.

  • Encryption and privacy controls: Memory portability must be secure by default. Encryption, consent logs, and clear revocation mechanisms are a must.

  • An open protocol or foundation: Ideally, this layer should be governed by a nonprofit or consortium—not a single company—so it doesn’t become just another silo.

  • Developer incentives: AI startups should be incentivized to support memory portability. This could become a competitive differentiator.

Why This Matters

As AI becomes more ambient—woven into every device, browser, and workflow—fragmented memory will become unbearable. Users will demand interoperability. And the companies that embrace memory portability may not just win trust—they may unlock a new layer of innovation.

Today, we’re still in the early “memory hoarding” phase of LLM platforms. But history favors openness. The companies that gave users ownership—over code, identity, or data—sparked ecosystems, not silos.

Whoever builds the “Plaid for memory” will unlock a better AI future. One where the most valuable thing—the story of you—is finally yours to own.