Pages

Thursday, June 26, 2025

Why Apple-Perplexity Merger Would Be Nearly Impossible (And Maybe a Mistake)



Why Apple-Perplexity Merger Would Be Nearly Impossible (And Maybe a Mistake)

In the history of tech, a few near-miss acquisition stories have become legend. Yahoo passed on buying Google for $1 million. Years later, it tried to buy Facebook for $1 billion. Facebook, wisely, said no. Had it said yes, Facebook likely wouldn’t exist today as we know it. Big fish don’t always know what to do with the more nimble, visionary minnows they try to swallow.

Now, a similar narrative is taking shape—only this time, the stakes are far higher. Rumors or speculation around Apple acquiring Perplexity AI—for a price that could top $200 billion—are swirling among analysts and insiders. But even if Apple could afford it, the real question is: Should it?

The answer, on multiple fronts, is likely no.


1. Mismatch of Cultures and Visions

Apple is a design-first, hardware-dominated, tightly integrated ecosystem company. Its product lifecycles are measured in years. Its DNA is secrecy, perfectionism, and control.

Perplexity, on the other hand, is a high-speed AI-native startup. Its core value lies in openness, information flow, and decentralization. It's building something more akin to an AI-infused, real-time knowledge engine for the internet. It iterates rapidly and is redefining what search, learning, and even cognition look like in a post-Google era.

Merging these two would be like trying to graft a hummingbird's wings onto an elephant. Even if the elephant pays $200 billion for those wings, it still won’t fly.


2. AI Breaks Silos — Apple Reinforces Them

AI-native companies like Perplexity aim to dissolve traditional silos—between apps, between knowledge domains, between user and machine. In contrast, Apple thrives by maintaining carefully walled gardens. From the App Store to iCloud to iMessage, Apple monetizes control.

That fundamental misalignment would make integration difficult, if not self-destructive.

An AI like Perplexity wants to answer everything, connect everything, go everywhere. Apple wants everything to go through Apple.


3. Without Leadership Transfer, It’s DOA

Let’s imagine Apple does buy Perplexity for $200 billion. If it doesn’t hand over a significant degree of operational autonomy—or better yet, elevate the Perplexity CEO to a top Apple leadership role—then it risks smothering the very magic it paid for.

You can’t buy vision, and you certainly can’t tame it. If Perplexity is absorbed into Apple as just another feature, like Siri once was, it will go the way of MySpace after its acquisition—stagnant and irrelevant. The deal would only make sense if Apple were ready to transform itself into an AI-native company and let Perplexity lead that transformation. But there's no indication Apple is even thinking that way.


4. Timing and Trajectory Matter

When Yahoo tried to buy Facebook, it was still the dominant portal. Facebook was growing but still small. Today, Perplexity is on the rise. It’s not a mature, stagnant startup looking for an exit. It's at the early stages of a trajectory that could reshape how we interact with knowledge entirely.

Selling to Apple now would cap its potential—both in market value and world impact. $200 billion may look tempting, but in the AI era, platforms that become the new internet interface might be worth trillions.

Why sell to a hardware company whose AI track record is—let’s be honest—lackluster?


Conclusion: Some Marriages Just Shouldn't Happen

The potential Perplexity brings to the table is too important, too expansive, and too transformative to be folded into Apple’s conservative, hardware-bound future. Unless Apple is willing to completely reinvent itself and hand the reins to AI-native leadership, such a merger would likely end in regret.

It wouldn’t be a strategic acquisition—it would be a slow-motion funeral for a company that might otherwise lead the next era of human-computer symbiosis.

Better idea? Let Perplexity keep flying. Let Apple keep building its walls. The future will reward the company that opens the most doors.




Perplexity Price: 200B For Apple. Bonus: CEO

The Rise of the Real Social Network: From Anti-Social Algorithms to Planetary Uplift

AI-Era Social Network: The Facebook Killer That Looks Nothing Like Facebook
Inside the Minds of the Greatest Angel Investors: What Sets Them Apart The $50 Trillion Unlock: Why GovTech, Not the BRI, Will Transform the Global South

Why Thinking Big Is the Safest Bet in the Age of AI and Exponential Technologies
AI-Era Social Network: Reimagined for Truth, Trust & Transformation
Corporate Culture/ Operating System: Greatness
Musk’s Management


The Rise of the Real Social Network: From Anti-Social Algorithms to Planetary Uplift

For the past two decades, what we’ve called "social networks" have been anything but. Designed to capture attention and monetize conflict, today’s platforms run on algorithms that divide, isolate, and misinform. They amplify outrage over understanding, fragmentation over unity. The result: more screen time, less face time. Less human connection, more digital addiction.

But what if we redefined what a social network really is?

A true social network wouldn’t keep you online. It would push you offline—into the arms of your family, your community, your neighbors. It would help you reconnect, not disconnect. It would amplify cooperation over conflict, reality over lies, and humanity over noise.

But that’s just the beginning.

A social network—if rooted in the Global South and designed for human flourishing—must go further. What if your biggest barriers were not interpersonal but systemic? What if your government is too corrupt and your economy too poor to give you the basics of dignity, opportunity, and prosperity?

This is where the social network meets GovTech and SpaceTech.

Estonia showed the world that you can build an end-to-end digital government from scratch. India went even bigger—creating Aadhaar (a biometric digital ID for 1.4 billion people) and UPI (a real-time payment system that has now become the backbone of India’s economy). These tools democratized identity and money. Africa doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel. It can license and localize the tech stack.

But why stop there?

We need to map every inch of land across the Global South using satellite imagery, drone scans, and geospatial AI. Every plot—rural or urban—can be registered and verified. When married with Aadhaar and UPI-style systems, this land data becomes bankable collateral. That’s how you unlock $50 trillion in dormant capital. That’s how you get investment flowing.

A real social network does this.
It doesn’t show you memes. It shows you how to get a mortgage.
It doesn’t connect influencers. It connects people to power, to property, to prosperity.

And yes, blockchain comes in—not as a gimmick, but as the backbone of a velocity money system. One where money flows instantly, frictionlessly, with integrity, traceability, and trust. Where diaspora remittances, aid, and investments become transparent engines of development.

The West is sleepwalking. BRI is a blip.
The Global South needs something better.

It needs a social network that heals society, digitizes government, maps the Earth, unleashes capital, and runs on truth.

And it’s not science fiction.
It’s just the future.
And it starts now.