Showing posts with label zelensky. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

30: Zelensky

This is Brooklyn. I might even have walked that street. Netizen: Beehiiv: The Infrastructure Behind the Modern Newsletter Economy https://t.co/wx7f13QCmL
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

whatever happened to perplexity?

at one point I thought it would dethrone google, now I have no idea what they're up to
— mert | helius (@mert) December 30, 2025

Six Weeks From Zero (novel)
The Dawn Beyond Currency (Part 1) (novel)
The Dawn Beyond Currency (Part 2) (novel)
The Great Subcontinent Uprising (Part 1) (novel)
The Great Subcontinent Uprising (Part 2) (novel)
The Great Subcontinent Uprising (novel)
The Banyan Revolt (novel)
Gen Z Kranti (novel)
The Protocol of Greatness (novel)
Madhya York: The Merchant and the Mystic (novel)
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
The Drum Report: Markets, Tariffs, and the Man in the Basement (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Poetry Thursdays (novel)

Tesla: Three Weeks From Zero (Short Story) https://t.co/7DcW85z0Qy
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

pic.twitter.com/eLL84yhULw
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 30, 2025

The progress in robotic hands is moving incredibly fast.

Here, ALLEX's 15-DOF hands perform micro-pick and fastening with high accuracy. Capable of detecting forces as small as 100 grams for fine manipulation, and maintains safe human-robot interaction.pic.twitter.com/Bybfype5GD
— Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai) December 30, 2025

This feels like a watershed moment. When the best engineers in the world are no longer writing a single line of code, and barely even looking at the code that's being generated.

This would have sounded insane just a year ago.

Hard to fathom what happens when the stuff @bcherny… https://t.co/DBKuwZUXjX pic.twitter.com/hMwiItwm03
— Lenny Rachitsky (@lennysan) December 30, 2025

The Twitter algorithm is tricking your consciousness.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

Bring down the costs. Compete with BYD on costs. Then we are talking.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

My advice to students is to chase the biggest and most prestigious logo early in your career

Harvard opens more doors than you can imagine. Having Goldman or Google on your resume as a first job can set you up for rest of your life

Do not fall for anyone telling you otherwise
— Boring_Business (@BoringBiz_) December 30, 2025

....... “the experience of being a small business owner leads people to adopt conservative views on government regulation.” So small business owners supported Trump in the belief that he would get the government off their backs. ........ High tariffs have been a body blow to the many small businesses that rely, one way or another, on imported goods. Mass arrests of immigrants have also been highly disruptive for businesses, such as construction contractors, that depend on foreign-born workers. ........... one unanticipated result of the Trump tariffs has been much more thorough exploitation of the rules of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, the agreement formerly known as NAFTA. It turns out that until this past spring, there were many goods produced in Mexico and Canada that were legally entitled to enter the U.S. duty free — but as long as tariffs were low, many importers chose not to pay the legal fees or fill out the paperwork needed to claim these exemptions. When Trump went on his tariff spree, the incentives changed, and many companies decided that the cost of the extra paperwork was worth it, after all: ........... under Trump the United States has moved rapidly toward crony capitalism, a situation in which businesses with strong political connections get favorable treatment. Under this system, big businesses can in effect buy themselves a privileged position. Small businesses can’t. ............ Apple has so far dodged most of the negative impact of Trump’s tariffs. Over the summer Trump imposed punitive tariffs on India, which is where most iPhones sold in the United States are produced. But for some reason smartphones were exempted from Trump’s India tariffs. What’s the logic behind this exemption? Might it have something to do with the fact that Apple is helping to pay for the construction of the grotesque ballroom that Trump is building to replace the demolished East Wing of the White House? ...........

2025 was a difficult year for many businesses not benefiting from the AI boom, but it was especially hard on small business.

Hate 2.0 The defining ideology of Trump 2.0 .............

If one word could summarize the ideology of the second Trump regime, it would be “hate.”

.............

BREAKING: GROK is working on MEMORIES!

Grok will soon remember details about you to personalize your experience!

You'll be able to delete the individual memories too! pic.twitter.com/f4vMwgTAR5
— Nima Owji (@nima_owji) December 30, 2025

i'm convinced the most interesting software of the next 5 years won't come from engineers

it'll come from designers and artists who finally have the tools to ship

the creative artisan arc is here. still early.

new project with @anthropicai on @claudeai 🧡 pic.twitter.com/48XboSst8c
— cole (@covacut) December 30, 2025

Any early stage founders want to do an early New Year’s lunch tomorrow at noon with @JaiRelan and I?

We can find a chill lunch spot in Dogpatch and just hang out.

Will give priority to ones that have recently moved.

DM please - will limit to 8 folks - and confirm in the am!
— Nikunj Kothari (@nikunj) December 30, 2025

Someone educate me.

- OpenAI
- Claude
- Manus
- Gemini

How do you determine when to use each one?
— Ryan Clogg (@RyanClogg) December 29, 2025

That day, when we heard ChatGPT was launching an agent product, I might have been the happiest person on earth. Many investors asked the same question: “What if ChatGPT builds the same thing?”

Honestly, we couldn’t really answer—because by the time people ask that, they already… https://t.co/oWj89TzAQK
— hidecloud (@hidecloud) December 30, 2025

The more I learn about China’s VC strategy, the more I think they’re running another race outside of AI where they have structural advantages to owning the generation of tech winners 2040 and beyond.

See China’s decision to mandate 70% of its new $21B National Venture Capital…
— Jason Shuman (@JasonrShuman) December 30, 2025

CES 2026 theme: the robots are coming.

Will get to as many as I can. https://t.co/jr0U90WaPY
— Robert Scoble (@Scobleizer) December 30, 2025

When a buyer calls your codebase "messy" during due diligence.

Selling your startup is emotional. No way around it.

You’ve spent years bleeding for the business with late nights, zero salary, the works.

Then a buyer comes in and looks at your "baby" and starts nitpicking every… pic.twitter.com/gcAw0eKaDD
— Andrew Gazdecki (@agazdecki) December 30, 2025

Lou Gerstner was one of the great American businessman, and someone I learned a lot from. He died two days ago, and after turning around IBM (a historic feat) became the Chair of the Broad Institute (I followed him in that role). He had great business skills of course but his…
— Eric Schmidt (@ericschmidt) December 30, 2025

This is the 1997 moment because building AI agents still feel complicated and awkward.

And that's why it's a wonderful time to be building AI agents in 2026. https://t.co/KIQBx6YZLE
— GREG ISENBERG (@gregisenberg) December 29, 2025

Every $100B co turned down many acquisition offers at $1B snd $10B to stand on its own https://t.co/qSsgYCQf4U
— Garry Tan (@garrytan) December 30, 2025

if you're Amazon, you need your Manus
if you're Shopify, you need your Manus
if you're Bookings, you need your Manus

if you're a big consumer/commerce brand, and don't own a major LLM, you need to build/acquire an agent because consumer *intent* is going away from consumer apps
— Matt Turck (@mattturck) December 30, 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro is very strong for science and mathematics.

From the FrontierMath site, solving Tier 4 "would provide evidence that AI can perform the complex reasoning needed for scientific breakthroughs in technical domains."

Getting very close! https://t.co/1DjJ1hHWIi
— Greg Brockman (@gdb) December 31, 2025

Here’s an insight about building consumer products after working at TikTok and now Manus:

Sometimes the best features are soooo obvious in hindsight, but to be able to come up with features as a solution to a super niche problem requires an immense understanding of the product.…
— Natalie (@gr00vyfairy) December 31, 2025

2025 wrapped 🧵:

- Launched 2 B2C apps → 350K+ users
- Made $250K+ total revenue and now $21K/month (All organic without paid ads)
- Quit my boring 9–5.
- Hit 45.5K followers on X.
- Bought my first car at 26
- Cracked TikTok marketing: 100M+ views across 40 accounts.
- Shipped…
— Alex Nguyen (@alexcooldev) December 30, 2025

I've got friends who now use voice AI to make multiple phone enquires in parallel and book the best option.

This is going to immediately DDOS businesses, right?
— Tom Blomfield (@t_blom) December 30, 2025

Founder mode is so 2024… 😜

2026 is all Founder code!

Vision → strategy → roadmap → OKR → product spec → design → eng lead → team → implementation → PR review → deploy.

By the time intent hits production, it’s been through ten games of telephone.

Founder code…
— Sebastian Siemiatkowski (@klarnaseb) December 30, 2025

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Instagram (@instagram)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Adam Grant (@adamgrant)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Best Founders (@thebestfounders)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Rohit Raghvendra (@rohitraghv_)

Split the shares. So Elon keeps the voting power since he needs to run a company, but the wealth goes to .... schools, hospitals, social housing, direct cash transfers.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

What kind of billionaire will abandon California just because he is having to pay a little more in taxes? What does that tell you about California? They are already never there. They are in Colorado on vacation.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

I fixed a bug my wife spotted in my app by chatting with Amp for a couple minutes.

In a previous life, I would've had to:

1. Create a ticket
2. Chat to my dev team
3. Loop in a PM and a designer
4. Review the fix

The whole thing would've taken at least a week.

I still…
— Ryan Carson (@ryancarson) December 30, 2025

This is an exciting day to be a creator on 𝕏

If you’re mostly a consumer on 𝕏, it’s not too late.

Just s tart by sharing what you’re most passionate about and try packaging it as best as you can

Then listen to your audience and make daily improvements

It’s that easy! https://t.co/yuMdVG3bD4
— Dan (@KettlebellDan) December 30, 2025

The Twitter algorithms have become so much better compared to say three years ago.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

There’s a strength training method called
Progressive Overload:

It’s a slow increase in the load placed on the body over time. You add a tiny amount of weight each week.

It’s very boring—but also very effective for long-term growth.

This isn’t a tweet about strength training.
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) December 30, 2025

SoftBank will make so much money when OpenAI goes public. Masa struck an awesome deal to have a delayed draw to fund. https://t.co/CGyyRqJtZ9
— Geoffrey Woo (@geoffreywoo) December 30, 2025

Pay me.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

Most people will not understand this but if you do, it will make you dollars.

Instead of making content that’s got 10 nuggets with 1 reason to do them.

You want to make content that has 1 nugget and 10 reasons to do it.

Don’t just give tactics. Sell them.
— Alex Hormozi (@AlexHormozi) December 30, 2025

Start from scratch. Neither looks that good.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

Just because your company's name is lemon does not mean your logo needs to look lemon.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) December 31, 2025

Sam Altman explained why focus is the ultimate force multiplier for success: pic.twitter.com/k2WYoCgBb4
— Jaynit (@jaynitx) December 30, 2025

Instead of politicians with higher ambitions trying to destroy tech for virtue signal points, maybe we need to help American tech win

And it’s not going well, possibly only worse from here if we don’t get leaders who understand and foster American technology https://t.co/54OkRrUh77
— Garry Tan (@garrytan) December 30, 2025

-2024 Democratic Party presidential nominee was from California
-2024 Democratic vice-presidential nominee was from Minnesota
-The leading contender for the 2028 Democratic Party presidential nomination is from California

Now remind me, which states have billions in fraud?
— Cameron Winklevoss (@cameron) December 30, 2025

This is partly why data centers in space will become cheaper than on Earth. They will be standalone entities made 100% in factories. No site prep. No brick and mortar construction. No utility hookups. No water systems for cooling. Those non-factory costs will become dominant. https://t.co/RytGtfbX9N
— Phil Metzger (@DrPhiltill) December 30, 2025

2026 career advice

Warren Buffett:

"Should you find yourself in a chronically leaking boat, energy devoted to changing vessels is likely to be more productive than energy devoted to patching leaks".

As you approach 2026, realistically evaluate the boat you're on and ensure…
— Gokul Rajaram (@gokulr) December 30, 2025

Feature of the year: Articles on X are coming dangerously close to making this often hellish app intelligent again.
— Matt Turck (@mattturck) December 30, 2025

We are not going to see many of these names in the $100M+ ARR column go public next year … but we are basically expecting MOST of the $1B + ARR group to try and go public over the next 1-2 years.

Meanwhile, literally ANYTHING approaching or growing fast toward $100M + ARR in… pic.twitter.com/ZnHmJwqXge
— JJ (@JosephJacks_) December 30, 2025

looking to hire an intern for the summer to hit enter when claude code asks if it can run a command
— parth (@parthsareen) December 30, 2025

JUST IN: Elon Musk tells X to increase creator payouts to compete with YouTube. pic.twitter.com/J3B4z1n4mD
— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) December 30, 2025

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Multiple Lenses on the Russia-Ukraine War: Power, Ideology, and the Elusive Road to Peace

Multiple Lenses on the Russia-Ukraine War: Power, Ideology, and the Elusive Road to Peace

The Russia-Ukraine war is one of the most consequential and multi-layered conflicts of the 21st century. At its surface, it appears to be a territorial invasion by a larger state against a smaller neighbor. But beneath the headlines lie a range of historical, ideological, geopolitical, and psychological dimensions. This is not just about tanks and trenches — it is a conflict that echoes through the halls of empires, democracy movements, and post-colonial reckonings.

Let’s unpack several distinct — yet interconnected — ways to understand the war and its broader implications.

1. Big Powers vs. Small States: Russia’s Monroe Doctrine?

One way to understand Russia’s aggression is through the lens of great power behavior. Vladimir Putin, in asserting that Ukraine should not fall under Western influence or join NATO, is essentially reviving a Russian version of the Monroe Doctrine — the 19th-century U.S. policy that warned European powers to stay out of the Americas.

From this view, Russia is acting not necessarily out of insecurity, but out of hegemonic instinct. It sees Ukraine not as a sovereign country making sovereign decisions, but as a zone of strategic interest, a buffer that must remain under Moscow’s sway.

But the flaw in this argument is exposed by Eastern Europe's voluntary embrace of NATO. Countries like Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Romania wanted to join the alliance — and paid a high price in terms of domestic reforms to do so. These are not puppet states manipulated by Washington; they are nations fleeing the legacy of Soviet domination.

2. Democracy vs. Autocracy: A Global Proxy Battle

Another powerful framing is ideological: this is a war between autocracy and democracy.

Ukraine represents more than just a state on the map — it’s an experiment in democratic development on Russia’s doorstep. A thriving, Western-aligned Ukraine sends a dangerous message to the Russian people: you too could be free.

There’s a reason there’s no Navalny in Estonia or Poland — because those nations, despite their struggles, have functioning democracies and rule of law. But Russia, like Saddam’s Iraq, relies on manufactured external enemies to maintain internal control. Dictatorships often need war or threats of war to justify authoritarian rule, censorship, and domestic repression.

Putin’s regime is no exception. The war sustains the myth of a besieged Russia encircled by hostile NATO forces and moral decay. Ending the war without losing face is not just a matter of diplomacy — it’s existential for the regime’s survival.

3. NATO Expansion: Demand-Driven, Not Imposed

Western critics often cite NATO’s expansion as a provocation. But this interpretation flips cause and effect. NATO didn’t expand because it wanted to “surround” Russia — it expanded because countries formerly dominated by Moscow clamored to join.

They did so because of legitimate fears about Russian revanchism, which have now proven entirely justified. Ukraine’s desire to align with the EU and NATO is not a conspiracy — it is a sovereign choice grounded in the national will.

4. The West’s Hypocrisy in Africa: France the Colonialist, Russia the Liberator?

While the West often frames itself as the defender of democracy, this narrative falters in other parts of the world — especially in West Africa. France’s neocolonial entanglements and economic dominance in former colonies have bred resentment, especially among the youth.

Enter Russia, not with ideals of democracy, but with anti-colonial rhetoric. Wagner mercenaries in Mali and Burkina Faso have positioned Moscow as the new liberator, exploiting the vacuum left by discredited Western influence. This contradiction exposes a truth: democracy and colonialism cannot coexist, and Western policy often fails to uphold its own professed values.

This undermines the West’s moral credibility and hands propaganda victories to Putin on a global scale.

5. The Limits of War: Why the Conflict Is So Hard to Resolve

This war is difficult to end because it's not just a war over territory — it’s a war over systems of governance and legitimacy.

Putin cannot afford to lose. A military defeat could spell political collapse. And yet, the West and Ukraine cannot allow a precedent to be set where aggression and occupation are rewarded. This impasse creates a deadly stalemate.

Further complicating matters, Putin’s methods — from poisoning opponents to assassinating ministers in parking lots — show the ruthlessness with which he consolidates power. For such a leader, peace is a threat, not a goal.

6. Toward a Political Solution: The Case for a Peace Formula

Military options are running thin. Sanctions have weakened Russia but failed to halt the war. Western military aid to Ukraine has enabled resistance but not victory. The “ceasefire-first” model — tried in 2014 and 2015 — has only led to frozen conflicts that later reignited.

A realistic peace formula must acknowledge that regime change in Moscow is not a viable strategy. Instead, it must pursue:

Security guarantees for Ukraine, possibly outside of NATO.
Withdrawal of Russian forces from occupied territories.
Phased sanctions relief tied to compliance.
An international security conference, with both Western and non-Western actors involved.

The book Formula for Peace in Ukraine lays out such a framework. It avoids the utopianism of total Russian democratization while not rewarding aggression. A YouTube presentation of the same name makes the case in more accessible form.

Conclusion: Multiple Truths, One Urgent Goal

The Russia-Ukraine war is not a puzzle with a single solution. It is a web of narratives — imperial legacies, ideological clashes, domestic survival strategies, and global hypocrisy. Recognizing this complexity is the first step toward crafting a durable peace.

But peace will not come from tanks or speeches alone. It will require moral clarity, political courage, and strategic creativity from leaders in Kyiv, Moscow, Washington, and beyond.

History is watching. Let it not be said that we were too narrow in our thinking, too divided in our action, or too late in our response. The world needs a roadmap — not for victory, but for peace with justice.

Further Reading:

Formula for Peace in Ukraine: Amazon
Video presentation: YouTube

रूस-यूक्रेन युद्ध के अनेक दृष्टिकोण: शक्ति, विचारधारा और शांति का कठिन रास्ता

रूस-यूक्रेन युद्ध 21वीं सदी के सबसे जटिल और महत्वपूर्ण संघर्षों में से एक है। सतह पर यह एक बड़े देश द्वारा छोटे पड़ोसी पर आक्रमण जैसा लगता है, लेकिन इसके नीचे इतिहास, विचारधारा, भू-राजनीति और सत्ता-राजनीति की कई परतें हैं। यह केवल टैंकों और लड़ाइयों की कहानी नहीं है — यह साम्राज्यों, लोकतंत्र आंदोलनों और उपनिवेशवाद के बाद की राजनीति की भी गूंज है।

आइए इस संघर्ष को समझने के कुछ मुख्य तरीकों को विस्तार से देखें।

1. बड़ी ताकतें बनाम छोटे राष्ट्र: रूस का मॉनरो सिद्धांत?

रूस की आक्रामकता को एक महाशक्ति के व्यवहार के रूप में देखा जा सकता है। व्लादिमीर पुतिन का यह दावा कि यूक्रेन को पश्चिमी प्रभाव या NATO का हिस्सा नहीं बनना चाहिए, मूलतः एक रूसी मॉनरो सिद्धांत को पुनर्जीवित करता है — जैसा कि 19वीं सदी में अमेरिका ने यूरोपीय शक्तियों के खिलाफ अमेरिका महाद्वीप में अपनाया था।

पुतिन यूक्रेन को एक स्वतंत्र राष्ट्र के रूप में नहीं, बल्कि एक रणनीतिक बफर ज़ोन के रूप में देखते हैं। लेकिन यह सोच तब ढह जाती है जब हम देखते हैं कि पूर्वी यूरोप के देशों ने स्वयं NATO में शामिल होने की इच्छा जताई थी और इसके लिए कठिन राजनीतिक और आर्थिक सुधार किए।

2. लोकतंत्र बनाम अधिनायकवाद: वैश्विक वैचारिक संघर्ष

इस युद्ध को एक लोकतंत्र बनाम अधिनायकवाद के संघर्ष के रूप में भी देखा जा सकता है।

यूक्रेन सिर्फ एक भूगोल नहीं है, वह रूस की सीमा पर लोकतंत्र का प्रतीक बन चुका है। यदि यूक्रेन सफल होता है, तो यह रूस की जनता को यह संदेश देगा कि वे भी स्वतंत्र हो सकते हैं।

इसलिए एस्टोनिया या पोलैंड में कोई "नवलनी" नहीं है — क्योंकि वहां लोकतांत्रिक संस्थाएं मजबूत हैं। लेकिन रूस जैसे अधिनायकवादी शासन को आंतरिक नियंत्रण बनाए रखने के लिए बाहरी दुश्मन की आवश्यकता होती है। सद्दाम हुसैन ने कुवैत पर हमला इसलिए किया क्योंकि उसकी सत्ता को ऐसे ही संघर्षों की जरूरत थी।

पुतिन का शासन भी इस पैटर्न पर चलता है। यह युद्ध आंतरिक नियंत्रण बनाए रखने का एक साधन है, शांति की ओर कदम नहीं।

3. NATO का विस्तार: मांग आधारित, थोपा नहीं गया

पश्चिम की आलोचना यह कहकर होती है कि NATO का विस्तार उकसावे वाला था। लेकिन यह तर्क सच्चाई को उल्टा प्रस्तुत करता है।

NATO ने विस्तार इसलिए नहीं किया क्योंकि वह रूस को घेरना चाहता था, बल्कि कई पूर्व सोवियत देश खुद इसमें शामिल होना चाहते थे। उन्होंने रूस के अधिपत्य से बचने के लिए NATO को चुना, और इसके लिए कड़े मानदंड पूरे किए। यूक्रेन की EU और NATO में जाने की इच्छा एक संप्रभु राष्ट्र की स्वतंत्र इच्छा है।

4. पश्चिम अफ्रीका में पाखंड: फ्रांस उपनिवेशवादी, रूस मुक्तिदाता?

पश्चिम खुद को अक्सर लोकतंत्र का रक्षक बताता है, लेकिन पश्चिम अफ्रीका जैसे क्षेत्रों में यह कथा खोखली लगती है।

फ्रांस की उपनिवेशवादी विरासत और आर्थिक प्रभुत्व ने वहां नाराज़गी पैदा की है। रूस, विशेष रूप से वाग्नर ग्रुप के माध्यम से, खुद को एक "उपनिवेशवाद विरोधी शक्ति" के रूप में प्रस्तुत करता है। जब लोकतंत्र और उपनिवेशवाद साथ-साथ खड़े होते हैं, तो पश्चिम की नैतिक स्थिति कमजोर हो जाती है।

इससे वैश्विक दक्षिण में पश्चिम के नैतिक आह्वान की विश्वसनीयता घटती है और पुतिन की प्रचार मशीन को ताकत मिलती है।

5. युद्ध की सीमाएं: समाधान क्यों मुश्किल है?

यह युद्ध केवल ज़मीन का नहीं, बल्कि शासन की वैधता और विचारधारा का युद्ध बन चुका है।

पुतिन हार नहीं सकते — हार का मतलब सत्ता से बाहर होना हो सकता है। वहीं पश्चिम और यूक्रेन यह स्वीकार नहीं कर सकते कि आक्रामकता को इनाम मिले। यही गतिरोध युद्ध को खींचता जा रहा है।

इसके अलावा, पुतिन के कार्य — चाहे विपक्षियों को जहर देना हो या मंत्रियों को मरवा देना — यह दिखाते हैं कि सत्ता बनाए रखने के लिए वे किस हद तक जा सकते हैं। ऐसे व्यक्ति के लिए शांति एक खतरा है, समाधान नहीं।

6. राजनीतिक समाधान की आवश्यकता: शांति सूत्र की बात

सैन्य रास्ते सीमित हो चुके हैं। प्रतिबंधों ने रूस को कमजोर किया लेकिन युद्ध को नहीं रोका। सैन्य सहायता ने यूक्रेन को बचाया पर जीत नहीं दिलाई। “पहले युद्धविराम” मॉडल 2014 और 2015 में विफल रहा है।

अब ज़रूरत है एक राजनीतिक रोडमैप की, जो इस संघर्ष को वास्तविकता के आधार पर सुलझा सके। इसमें हो सकता है:

यूक्रेन को सुरक्षा गारंटी, NATO में शामिल हुए बिना।
रूसी सेना की वापसी।
प्रतिबंधों में चरणबद्ध राहत, अनुपालन पर आधारित।
एक अंतरराष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा सम्मेलन, जिसमें पश्चिम और वैश्विक दक्षिण दोनों की भागीदारी हो।

Formula for Peace in Ukraine नामक पुस्तक इसी तरह का एक यथार्थवादी फ्रेम प्रस्तुत करती है। इसका YouTube प्रस्तुतीकरण भी उपलब्ध है।

निष्कर्ष: कई सत्य, एक उद्देश्य

रूस-यूक्रेन युद्ध कोई एक सूत्रीय समस्या नहीं है। यह शक्ति, विचारधारा, इतिहास और भू-राजनीति का जटिल संगम है।

शांति केवल सैन्य बल या बयानबाज़ी से नहीं आएगी। इसके लिए नैतिक स्पष्टता, राजनीतिक साहस, और रणनीतिक चतुराई की आवश्यकता है।

इतिहास हमें देख रहा है। हमारी सोच सीमित, हमारे कदम विभाजित और हमारी प्रतिक्रिया देर से न हो — यही आज की पुकार है।

अधिक जानकारी के लिए:

पुस्तक: Formula for Peace in Ukraine
वीडियो प्रस्तुति: YouTube लिंक

रूस-यूक्रेन युद्ध के अनेक दृष्टिकोण: शक्ति, विचारधारा और शांति का कठिन रास्ता https://t.co/ZwNuKxeGfU
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 26, 2025

Pages